SGH Ex-20 Australian Equities Fund
About this Fund
Fund Detail
PDS | https://informedinvestor.com.au/view/pds/100162-2024-01-18-02:48.pdf |
FUND MANAGER | SG Hiscock & Company Limited |
ASX Code | |
APIR | CRS0003AU |
ASSET CLASS | AUSTRALIAN EQUITIES |
INVESTMENT STYLE | The Fund invests in a concentrated portfolio of companies that are primarily listed on the ASX, excluding the largest 20 securities by market capitalisation in the S&P/ASX 300 Accumulation Index. |
INVESTMENT PROFILE | The Fund aims to outperform the Benchmark, after fees, over rolling three year periods. |
CURRENCY MANAGEMENT | Unhedged |
INCEPTION DATE | 01-12-1992 |
BENCHMARK | S&P/ASX 300 ex S&P/ASX 20 Index |
FUND SIZE | S&P/ASX 300 ex S&P/ASX 20 Index |
DISTRIBUTION FREQUENCY | Half-yearly |
NO. OF HOLDINGS | 20-60 |
FEES | 0.95% p.a. of the NAV of the Fund |
STRUCTURE |
Benefits
Benefits | Benefits of investing in the SGH Ex-20 Australian Equities FundInvesting in the Fund offers a number of benefits, including:
|
RISK LEVEL | 7 |
INVESTOR SUITABILITY | Investor SuitabilityMainly direct and indirect investors seeking long term capital growth with some income through investment in Australian equity securities. |
Risks
Title | |
Detail |
Key Features
About the FundThe SGH Ex-20 Australian Equities Fund is a high conviction actively managed Australian equity portfolio built using a bottom-up approach with little reference to a benchmark. Utilising SGH's proven equity investment philosophy and approach, that is replicated and consistent across all equity investment desks, we seek to identify quality companies trading at reasonable valuations through our own first hand research. The normal characteristics of the Fund include:
|
Mandate
How we invest your moneyOur equity managers seek to identify and invest in good quality Australian listed securities through first hand company visits. Quality is chiefly an evaluation of a company's management, balance sheet and business model. Only those companies which pass our rigorous quality screen are assessed for value. We see risk in terms of investing in a poor quality company, or overpaying for a good one, and do not view risk in benchmark relative terms. We therefore downplay benchmarks in portfolio construction since these provide little indication of future performance. We are comfortable not holding companies if they do not satisfy our disciplined quality and valuation criteria, regardless of their benchmark weight. |